Short & Long Term Disability Cases We’ve Won for Our Clients Against The Hartford

Fields Law Firm successfully recovers millions of dollars each year for our disabled clients throughout the United States. Our Long Term Disability experience is matched by very few other law firms in the country and has earned us a national reputation.

Here are just a few examples of our Long Term Disability appeal case wins against The Hartford.

We've got you covered

Debbie – Financial Assistance Specialist – Rochester, Minnesota

Major Depression, Anxiety

A Financial Assistance Specialist was unable to work due to major depression and anxiety. The Hartford, which had initially paid her benefits suddenly stopped, even though she had seen no improvement in her symptoms.

She reached out to Fields Law Firm, who did not hesitate to start preparing an appeal that showed her psychological condition had not changed and that she remained entitled to benefits. In this appeal, we showed that The Hartford based its denial on a selective and partial review of our client’s medical records. We also obtained medical opinions from her treating doctors to support the persistence of her impairments. Our appeal was successful and our client was relieved when she learned that her benefits would continue. The Hartford reinstated disability benefits after the Fields Law attorneys successfully appealed its decision to discontinue a disabled worker’s benefits.

Mark – Security Counselor – Willow River, Minnesota

Chronic Upper Rxtremity Pain, Bilateral Shoulder Pain, Right Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

A security counselor worked at a correctional facility before becoming disabled with chronic upper extremity pain, bilateral shoulder pain and right shoulder impingement syndrome, which required surgery. He applied for and received Long Term Disability benefits while he continued to rehabilitate from his surgery. After a few months, the insurance company terminated his benefits, alleging that he was capable of performing all of the substantial physical activity requirements listed in his employer’s job description.

The corrections officer approached Fields Law to represent him in appealing the discontinuation of his benefits. The team at Fields Law worked diligently to review all of the information The Hartford had in its file and supplemented that with updated medical records from our client’s providers. Based on our experience, we knew that The Hartford had possibly glossed over the administrative record and cherry picked evidence to support their denial. We noticed that The Hartford never considered the need to defend oneself and others when intervening with combative inmates. Although rare in terms of frequency on a daily basis, the need to physically intervene when the threat arises is fundamental to the job of a security counselor.

The Fields Law attorneys drafted a strong appeal for our client, highlighting the importance of a security counselor’s ability to physically restrain combative inmates, even if the occurrence is rare. Our attorneys clearly detailed that The Hartford had failed to consider our client’s inability to physically restrain an inmate or defend himself due to his bilateral shoulder impingement, they then reversed the denial and reinstated benefits.

Victoria – Registered Nurse – Glencoe, Minnesota

Chronic Mental Health Issues

A nurse who had enjoyed her work for many years became completely unable to do her job due to her chronic mental health issues. She suffered from depression and anxiety, which significantly affected her ability to care for her patients at work. The Hartford denied the nurse’s application for Long Term Disability despite the fact that she submitted a letter from her attending physician that stated she would likely never be able to return to work.

She turned to Fields Law Firm for help during this difficult time. Our team prepared an appeal that exposed The Hartford’s deficient review of our client’s claim, especially its failure to consider how our client’s mental health condition made it impossible for her to complete tasks required in the nursing profession. The appeal summarized diagnostic testing and the opinions of her doctors in support of her inability to work as a nurse. The Hartford finally realized its initial decision was in error and our client was issued her benefits.